Reichelderfer v. Quinn
53 F.2d 1079, 60 App. D.C. 325, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 7, 1931·No. No. 5230·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
It is agreed by counsel that the issue presented in this appeal and also the parties involved are identical with those appearing in Quinn et al. v. Dougherty et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, decided by this court January 7, 3929, 58 App. D. C. 339, 30 F.(2d) 749. It is only necessary now to say that, consistently with onr decision in tho former case, we affirm the decree of the lower court herein appealed from.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 53 F.2d 1079, 60 App. D.C. 325, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822 (D.C. Cir. 1931).
53 F.2d 1079 (Reichelderfer v. Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
E. F. Barnes, J. C. Carson, J. Jelks and J. Robertson v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
268 F.2d 593 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Stevens v. Mayor and Council of City of Vinita
1957 OK 189 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)