Reichelderfer v. Quinn

D.C. Circuit

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

53 F.2d 1079, 60 App. D.C. 325, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1931

DocketNo. 5230

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 53 F.2d 1079 (Reichelderfer v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 53 F.2d 1079, 60 App. D.C. 325, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822 (D.C. Cir. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is agreed by counsel that the issue presented in this appeal and also the parties involved are identical with those appearing in Quinn et al. v. Dougherty et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, decided by this court January 7, 3929, 58 App. D. C. 339, 30 F.(2d) 749. It is only necessary now to say that, consistently with onr decision in tho former case, we affirm the decree of the lower court herein appealed from.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is agreed by counsel that the issue presented in this appeal and also the parties involved are identical with those appearing in Quinn et al. v. Dougherty et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, decided by this court January 7, 3929, 58 App. D. C. 339, 30 F.(2d) 749. It is only necessary now to say that, consistently with onr decision in tho former case, we affirm the decree of the lower court herein appealed from.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F.2d 1079, 60 App. D.C. 325, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reichelderfer-v-quinn-cadc-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack