Reeves v. . Miller
183 S.E. 294, 209 N.C. 362, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 481
Opinion
It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions discussed in defendant’s brief, as the deed attacked by the plaintiffs in this action appears on its face to be a deed of gift, and was not registered within two years as required by C. S., 3315.
The deed was therefore void. Booth v. Hairston, 195 N. C., 8.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reeves v. . Miller, 183 S.E. 294, 209 N.C. 362, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 481 (N.C. 1936).
183 S.E. 294 (Reeves v. . Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justice v. Mitchell
78 S.E.2d 122 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Ferguson v. . Ferguson
35 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Feeguson v. Feeguson
225 N.C. 375 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Winstead v. . Woolard
28 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Cutts v. . McGhee
20 S.E.2d 376 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)