Cutts v. McGhee

221 N.C. 465
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DeNNY, J.

The deed of gift executed 28 July, 1900, was not registered within two years from its execution, as required by Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, sec. 3315, and was void at the time of its registration, 12 January, 1904. Curative acts of the Legislature do not revive void instruments. Booth v. Hairston, 193 N. C., 278, 136 S. E., 879; S. c., 195 N. C., 8, 141 S. E., 480; Reeves v. Miller, 209 N. C., 362, 183 S. E., 294; Allen v. Allen, 209 N. C., 744, 184 S. E., 485.

Acknowledgment of the execution of an instrument is not a re-execution of it.

His Honor’s ruling in the court below was correct, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutts v. McGhee, 221 N.C. 465 (N.C. 1942).

221 N.C. 465 (Cutts v. McGhee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justice v. Mitchell
78 S.E.2d 122 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Winstead v. . Woolard
28 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)