Reeves v. City of Atlanta

118 S.E.2d 378, 216 Ga. 592, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 289
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 9, 1961
Docket21136
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 118 S.E.2d 378 (Reeves v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeves v. City of Atlanta, 118 S.E.2d 378, 216 Ga. 592, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 289 (Ga. 1961).

Opinion

Quillian, Justice.

1. Where the City of Atlanta, on July 5, 1960, under the provisions of the act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 387 et seq.; Code Ann. § 36-601a et seq.), instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire a perpetual easement over a private alley for use in connection with a fire-department station, and the superior court referred the matter to a named special master, the owner of the private alley could not by petition for injuction, brought on July 20, 1960, defeat the condemnation proceeding or litigate the issue that the property sought to be condemned was being condemned for private rather than public purposes. Such issue must be litigated in the condemnation proceeding, and the trial court did not err *593 in dissolving the original restraining order and in refusing the temporary injunction prayed. Johnson v. Fulton County, 216 Ga. 498 (117 S. E. 2d 155); Fulton County v. Aronson, 216 Ga. 497 (117 S. E. 2d 166); Mitchell v. State Highway Dept. 216 Ga. 517 (118 S. E. 2d 88).

Argued January 10, 1961 Decided February 9, 1961. John L. Westmoreland, John L. Westmoreland, Jr., Harry P. Hall, Jr., M. K. Pentecost, Jr., for plaintiff in error. J. C. Savage, Martin McFarland, contra.

2. This judgment is not to be construed as in any way affecting the rights of the parties to the condemnation proceeding. The status of each issue is as though this suit had never-been instituted, and any pleadings that could have initially been filed in the condemnation proceedings may now be filed in the same.

Judgment ajfirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Power Co. v. Jones
178 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Wiggins v. City of MacOn
169 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Phillips v. Georgia Power Co.
168 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Golfland, Inc. v. Thomas
130 S.E.2d 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E.2d 378, 216 Ga. 592, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1961.