Fulton County v. Aronson

117 S.E.2d 166, 216 Ga. 497, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 513
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1960
Docket21021
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 117 S.E.2d 166 (Fulton County v. Aronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulton County v. Aronson, 117 S.E.2d 166, 216 Ga. 497, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 513 (Ga. 1960).

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

This case involves a suit brought against Hal J. Aronson by Fulton County, to condemn 50 acres of residential land bordering the Chattahoochee River in an R-l Section of the county, for use as the Marsh Creek Sewage Disposal Plant. The defendant filed a petition to enjoin the condemnation by the county, upon the ground that the county has acted in bad faith and has abused its discretion, in that it is seeking to condemn far more property than is necessary. A temporary restraining order was issued, and the county filed defensive pleadings to the injunction suit. The matter came on for hearing and an interlocutory injunction was granted. Later, the court also overruled the county’s general demurrers to the petition for injunction. The exceptions are to these judgments. Held:

1. A defendant cannot decline to litigate in a suit in which he has already been brought into court, by bringing another action, but is bound to set up all defenses in the first suit. Jeffrey McElreath Mfg. Co. v. Hill, 212 Ga. 183 (91 S. E. 2d 337, and cases there cited.

2. The plaintiff’s petition showing on its face that there was pending at the time it was filed another suit brought by the county under Ga. L. 1957, p. 387 (Code Ann. Ch. 36-6A), seeking to condemn the plaintiff’s land, in which suit he could have set up his contentions that the county had acted in bad faith and had abused its discretion, in that it was seeking to condemn far more property than was necessary, the trial judge erred in overruling the general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, and in granting the interlocutory injunction excepted to. Marist Society of Ga. v. City of Atlanta, *498 212 Ga. 115 (90 S. E. 2d 564); O. K., Inc. v. State Highway Dept., 213 Ga. 666 (100 S. E. 2d 716); Russell v. Venable, 216 Ga. 137, 143 (4) (115 S. E. 2d 103).

Argued September 15, 1960 Decided November 10, 1960 Rehearing denied November 22, 1960. Harold Sheats, Griffin Patrick, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Moms B. Abram, John Hicks, Heyman, Abram & Young, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Transportation v. Samuels
366 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Georgia Power Co. v. Jones
178 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Wiggins v. City of MacOn
169 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Phillips v. Georgia Power Co.
168 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Best v. Georgia Power Company
164 S.E.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Miles v. Brown
156 S.E.2d 898 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Johnston v. Clayton County Water Authority
148 S.E.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Benton v. State Highway Department
141 S.E.2d 396 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Golfland, Inc. v. Thomas
130 S.E.2d 591 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
State Highway Department v. McCurdy
124 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Reeves v. City of Atlanta
118 S.E.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Mitchell v. State Highway Department
118 S.E.2d 88 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E.2d 166, 216 Ga. 497, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-county-v-aronson-ga-1960.