Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

594 F.3d 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 594 F.3d 798
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 29, 2009·No. 07-10270·Published

Opinion

569 F.3d 1290 (2009)

Ingrid REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-10270.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 2009.

Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, GA, David Lynn Warren, Jr., Sandra B. Reiss, Christopher A. Mixon, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion *1291 of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 594 F.3d 798 (11th Cir. 2009).

594 F.3d 798 (Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
M.D. Florida, 2026