Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
This text of 594 F.3d 798 (Reeves v. CH Robinson Worldwide, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ingrid REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, GA, David Lynn Warren, Jr., Sandra B. Reiss, Christopher A. Mixon, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion *1291 of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 F.3d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-ch-robinson-worldwide-inc-ca11-2009.