Reese v. Village of Mount Prospect
219 N.E.2d 682, 72 Ill. App. 2d 418
Opinion
Arthur Reese and Emily Reese, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Village of Mount Prospect, a Body Politic and Corporate, Defendant-Appellant.
Illinois Appellate Court First District, Second Division.
Ross, Hardies, O'Keefe, Babcock, McDugald & Parsons, of Chicago (Jack M. Siegel and R. Marlin Smith, of counsel), for appellant.
Harry G. Fins, of Chicago, for appellees.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by JUSTICE BURKE.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for the defendant and against the plaintiffs.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reese v. Village of Mount Prospect, 219 N.E.2d 682, 72 Ill. App. 2d 418 (Ill. Ct. App. 1966).
219 N.E.2d 682 (Reese v. Village of Mount Prospect) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tomasek v. City of Des Plaines
325 N.E.2d 345 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Oak Park National Bank v. Village of Norredge
273 N.E.2d 47 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1971)
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Mount Prospect
266 N.E.2d 747 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1970)
Rebman v. City of Springfield
250 N.E.2d 282 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1969)
Gans v. City of Chicago
243 N.E.2d 400 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1968)