Reese v. State

80 S.W.2d 1117, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 739
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reese v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 659
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 1935·No. No. 17363·Published

Opinion

MORROW,. Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented.

Appellant was tried before a jury. The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review.

The judgment and sentence properly condemn appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one nor more than two years.

Nothing appears justifying a reversal or requiring discuSsion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. State, 80 S.W.2d 1117, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 739 (Tex. 1935).

80 S.W.2d 1117 (Reese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.