Reese v. State
This text of 64 S.W.2d 1114 (Reese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment is regular and properly presented.
The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review.
A new trial was sought upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. The materiality of the evidence and its probable effect upon another trial cannot be known to this court in the absence of the evidence which was heard upon the trial, which is not brought up for review.
Failing to find any matter presented which would justify a reversal of the judgment, an affirmance is ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 S.W.2d 1114, 124 Tex. Crim. 659, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.