Reese v. MVB Bank Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 18, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-02026
StatusUnknown

This text of Reese v. MVB Bank Inc. (Reese v. MVB Bank Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. MVB Bank Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEVON REESE, Plaintiff, 25-CV-2026 (JPO) -V- ORDER MVB BANK INC., Defendant.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action “if the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with the rules or a court order.” Baptiste v. Sommers, 768 F.3d 212, 216 (2d Cir. 2014). It is settled that Rule 41(b) “gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiffs case sua sponte for failure to prosecute,” which strikes the appropriate balance “between alleviating court calendar congestion and protecting a party’s right to due process and a fair chance to be heard.” LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001). As discussed at the telephone conference held on June 18, 2025, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Attorney Meir Rubinov is directed to serve this Order on Plaintiff Devon Reese at his last known email address. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 18, 2025 New York, New York

| J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barry Lesane v. Hall's Security Analyst, Inc.
239 F.3d 206 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Baptiste v. Sommers
768 F.3d 212 (Second Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reese v. MVB Bank Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-mvb-bank-inc-nysd-2025.