Reel v. . Boyd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Reel v. . Boyd

141 S.E. 891, 195 N.C. 273, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 63

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 7, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 141 S.E. 891 (Reel v. . Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reel v. . Boyd, 141 S.E. 891, 195 N.C. 273, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 63 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

CoNNOR, J.

Defendant demurred to the complaint for that summons had not been served within ten days after it was issued, and that no alias or pluries summons had been issued in the action. The demurrer cannot be sustained upon this ground. Defendant by his general appearance in the action waived all defects with respect to service of summons. *274 The statute provides tbat a voluntary appearance by a defendant is equivalent to personal service of summons. C. S., 490. An appearance for the purpose of filing a demurrer to the complaint is a voluntary, general appearance, and the court in which the action was brought thereby acquires jurisdiction of the defendant.

Defendant demurred upon the further ground that there is a defect of parties plaintiff, upon the facts alleged in the demurrer. It does not appear upon the face of the complaint that there is any defect of parties. Upon the facts alleged in the complaint, plaintiff has a cause of action against the defendant upon which she may alone recover. It is only where a defect of parties is apparent on the face of the complaint that objection can be taken thereto by demurrer. Where there is no defect of parties upon the allegations of the complaint, objection must be made by answer. Styers v. Alspaugh, 118 N. C., 630. The demurrer filed in the instant case is what is called “a speaking demurrer,” and should have been .overruled. A demurrer which is dependent upon allegations therein, or which attempts to sustain itself is bad. S. v. McCanless, 193 N. C., 200; Latham v. Highway Commission, 185 N. C., 134.

Plaintiff’s motion in this Court that certain persons be made parties plaintiff is denied. Upon defendant’s filing an answer in the Superior Court plaintiff may renew her motion to make additional parties plaintiff. The motion will then be heard and considered without prejudice from the denial of her motion in this Court, or of any motion she may have made heretofore in the Superior Court. There is error in the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action.. "The judgment is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CoNNOR, J.

Defendant demurred to the complaint for that summons had not been served within ten days after it was issued, and that no alias or pluries summons had been issued in the action. The demurrer cannot be sustained upon this ground. Defendant by his general appearance in the action waived all defects with respect to service of summons. *274 The statute provides tbat a voluntary appearance by a defendant is equivalent to personal service of summons. C. S., 490. An appearance for the purpose of filing a demurrer to the complaint is a voluntary, general appearance, and the court in which the action was brought thereby acquires jurisdiction of the defendant.

Defendant demurred upon the further ground that there is a defect of parties plaintiff, upon the facts alleged in the demurrer. It does not appear upon the face of the complaint that there is any defect of parties. Upon the facts alleged in the complaint, plaintiff has a cause of action against the defendant upon which she may alone recover. It is only where a defect of parties is apparent on the face of the complaint that objection can be taken thereto by demurrer. Where there is no defect of parties upon the allegations of the complaint, objection must be made by answer. Styers v. Alspaugh, 118 N. C., 630. The demurrer filed in the instant case is what is called “a speaking demurrer,” and should have been .overruled. A demurrer which is dependent upon allegations therein, or which attempts to sustain itself is bad. S. v. McCanless, 193 N. C., 200; Latham v. Highway Commission, 185 N. C., 134.

Plaintiff’s motion in this Court that certain persons be made parties plaintiff is denied. Upon defendant’s filing an answer in the Superior Court plaintiff may renew her motion to make additional parties plaintiff. The motion will then be heard and considered without prejudice from the denial of her motion in this Court, or of any motion she may have made heretofore in the Superior Court. There is error in the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action.. "The judgment is

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 S.E. 891, 195 N.C. 273, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reel-v-boyd-nc-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack