Reed v. The City of New York

Opinion

——=="mama{_Kax=_=_=_=_=_=_==*=_=_=*<£=_$_$_=—i EI)“ — ———L—L——_—_ LS | VoL ovNst UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |] DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK #f ELECTRONICALLY FI DOC #: DATE FILED: 8/23/2024 CAWin Reed 20 ~VEBER WMOXTOA (List the full name(s) of thecplatrrtttts}/petitioner(s).) □ agai MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE,,. = & f) etal. OF APPEAL = 2 =~ □□□ = ier {List the full name(s) of the*dete espondent(s).} a □ □ aT TRE OTR Soe = @ I move under Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure for an extension of teme a □□□ to file a notice of appeal in this action. I would like to appeal the judgment entered in this action on □□□ fet but did not file a notice of appeal within the required 5 date time period because: Saw Working whut atforNey on hy th Cases: RV-IOUY, Ay 20-Cv- T3572. v . A, / id ‘M!, ? L Cr fio 36 £2 Ose € (Ly Janie: Wectth.!/ fawt Deen Wieking Gy IS, tne both Céses tw bhout QN xpjain here the excusable neglect or good cause th ay ed to your failyre to fi timely notice of appeal.) htorrey weld the NY/AG he//

12 Coke fated: Signature Ren, Calvin Name (Last, First, Ml) _— 2459 Weboter MA rll 0458 Address City State Zip Code QC2Q) V4 53BE-¢ Vout Telephone Number E-mail Address (if available) GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file written objections to Magistrate Judge Moses' Memorandum and Order (Dkt. No. 122) to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) on or before September 6, 2024. Failure to file timely objections will sult in a waiver of such objections and will preclude appellate review. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cnty, 517 F.3d 601, 605 (2d Cir. 2005. Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Dkt. No. 123. ORDERED. Dated August 23, 2024. ae —f-—

5 \ I 4 .

UT) ys is CAS _ \ ae = {gas mS 6 nai: 08 = : | = . ae = AAA □ =

ng Wi S = “ > AN Sxgs □ ss SE OX cg 8 sigoas & Wy MY ~ = x ‘2 SENG a) (M3 = ge 8 x XS —

> TQ Os¥ A 52 ZR)