Reed v. State.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Reed v. State.

289 S.E.2d 519, 161 Ga. App. 79, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3011

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 26, 1982

Docket63466

StatusPublished

This text of 289 S.E.2d 519 (Reed v. State.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. State., 289 S.E.2d 519, 161 Ga. App. 79, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3011 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction under an indictment charging him with two counts of robbery. His appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered arguably could support an appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We are in agreement with counsel that the points raised are not meritorious and an independent examination discloses no errors of any substance. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and we affirm the conviction. The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction under an indictment charging him with two counts of robbery. His appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered arguably could support an appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We are in agreement with counsel that the points raised are not meritorious and an independent examination discloses no errors of any substance. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and we affirm the conviction. The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant’s guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 S.E.2d 519, 161 Ga. App. 79, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack