Reed v. Reed

816 So. 2d 1246, 2002 WL 1071533
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2002
Docket5D01-2304
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 1246 (Reed v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Reed, 816 So. 2d 1246, 2002 WL 1071533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

816 So.2d 1246 (2002)

George Hopp REED, Appellant,
v.
Jo Marie REED, Appellee.

No. 5D01-2304.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 31, 2002.

*1247 Shannon McLin Carlyle of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Leesburg, for Appellant.

Jo Marie Reed, Staten Island, NY, pro se.

PETERSON, J.

George Hopp Reed appeals the trial court's denial of his "Motion to Vacate Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence." The judgment was entered on December 29, 1998 while Reed and his wife, both New York residents, were vacationing in Florida.

Reed filed his verified motion on June 29, 2001 and the trial court denied the motion on July 2, 2001 without a hearing. This short period did not allow Reed enough time for service of his motion on his wife; nor was there enough time to allow Reed to schedule a hearing on the matter.

The 1998 judgment advises that either party to the injunction may ask the court to change or end the injunction at any time. That provision conforms to section 741.30, Florida Statutes, which also prescribes that privilege.

Due process requires that Reed be given the opportunity to be heard on his request and that his motion should not be summarily disposed of within three days after it is filed. We express no opinion on the merits of Reed's motion.

The order denying the motion to dissolve the injunction is vacated and we remand in order to allow Reed to obtain service of his motion on his wife and to allow him to schedule an evidentiary hearing on the motion.

VACATED; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larry Jamison v. Chauntrell Knox
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
JACK KACHKAR v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
JOSHUA S. BORK v. SARA MARIE PARE
252 So. 3d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Palm v. Palm
214 So. 3d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Peaslee v. Perrine
202 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Carrozza v. Stowers
153 So. 3d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Baker v. Pucket
139 So. 3d 954 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Raymonvil v. Lewis
46 So. 3d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
McCormick v. Shannon
32 So. 3d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Betterman v. Kukelhan
977 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 So. 2d 1246, 2002 WL 1071533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-reed-fladistctapp-2002.