Palm v. Palm
This text of Palm v. Palm (Palm v. Palm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CHARLES L. PALM,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-2368
ASHLEY PALM N/K/A ASHLEY PLONK,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed April 7, 2017
Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Jennifer Opel Taylor, Judge.
Charles L. Palm, Moore Haven, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Charles L. Palm appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition to dissolve a final
judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. Palm argues that the trial
court erred in summarily denying the petition and that the trial court should have held a
hearing. We agree. See Reed v. Reed, 816 So. 2d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002);
Baker v. Pucket, 139 So. 3d 954, 955-56 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Carrozza v. Stowers, 153
So. 3d 340, 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Thus, we reverse the order under review and
remand with instructions for the trial court to hold a hearing on Palm’s petition. REVERSED and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Palm v. Palm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palm-v-palm-fladistctapp-2017.