Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Reed v. Kinkela

Reed v. Kinkela

705 N.E.2d 363, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1481, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. Kinkela. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Ohio St. 3d 1427 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1999·No. 98-2041·Published

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss and on motions for leave to supplement the record. Motions granted and cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Kinkela, 705 N.E.2d 363, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1481, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 268 (Ohio 1999).

705 N.E.2d 363 (Reed v. Kinkela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.