Reed v. Doe

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 27, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-10079·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 10079 (KMW) JUDGMENT JANE DOE, Defendant. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 25, 2025, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(~ii). The Court has denied all pending motions. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); judgment is entered dismissing the action. Dated: New York, New York June 27, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG ClerkofCourt

BY: HK. MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Doe, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Reed v. Doe (Reed v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)