Reeber v. Rossell

200 F.2d 334
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 1952
Docket22465
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 200 F.2d 334 (Reeber v. Rossell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeber v. Rossell, 200 F.2d 334 (2d Cir. 1952).

Opinion

200 F.2d 334

REEBER
v.
ROSSELL et al.

No. 71.

Docket 22465.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 12, 1952.

Decided December 3, 1952.

Rogge, Fabricant & Gordon and Murray Gordon, New York City, attorneys and counsel for plaintiff-appellant.

Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty., Richard P. Donovan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Thomas V. O'Keefe and Terence J. McDonnell, Attorneys, Veterans Administration, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Since the members of the United States Civil Service Commission have not been made parties to this action, the court was without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the plaintiff's claim. Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512, 72 S.Ct. 410. The Blackmar decision apparently was not called to the attention of the court below, and only the merits were dealt with by Judge McGohey in his opinion dismissing the complaint, 106 F.Supp. 373. But in our view the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Blackmar v. Guerre, supra, evidently required a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly the judgment of the district court should be modified by directing the dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and as so modified is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raymond E. Dodd v. Tennessee Valley Authority
770 F.2d 1038 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Haine v. Googe
289 F.2d 931 (Second Circuit, 1961)
Payne v. McKee
153 F. Supp. 932 (E.D. Virginia, 1957)
Schustack v. Herren
234 F.2d 134 (First Circuit, 1956)
Bernstein v. Herren
234 F.2d 434 (First Circuit, 1956)
Schustack v. Herren
234 F.2d 134 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Bernstein v. Herren
234 F.2d 434 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Burns v. Mccrary
229 F.2d 286 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Marshall v. Wyman
132 F. Supp. 169 (N.D. California, 1955)
Shargel v. Hollis
120 F. Supp. 814 (S.D. New York, 1954)
De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy
112 F. Supp. 778 (S.D. New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 F.2d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeber-v-rossell-ca2-1952.