Redford v. Unirush Financial Service, LLC

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Mike Redford, : Plaintiff(s), : Case Number: 1:20cv632 vs. : : Judge Susan J. Dlott Unirush Financial Service, LLC, et al., : Defendant(s). ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on October 15, 2020 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is DENIED. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the full $400 fee ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) required to commence this action within thirty days (30) days, and that plaintiff be notified that his failure to pay the full $400 fee within thirty days will result in the dismissal of his action See In Re Alea, 286, F.3d 378, 382 (6" Cir. 2002). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order

adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. See McGore vy. Wrigglesworth, 114 F. 3d 601 (6" Cir. 1997). IT IS □□ ORDERED.

Judge Susan J. ig United States District Court