Redding v. Safford Unified School District 1

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Redding v. Safford Unified School District 1. Read the opinion of the Court — 504 F.3d 828
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2008·No. 05-15759·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APRIL REDDING, legal guardian of  minor child, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-15759 v. D.C. No. SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT #1; KERRY WILSON, husband; JANE  CV-04-00265-NFF District of Arizona, DOE WILSON, wife; HELEN ROMERO, Tucson wife; JOHN DOE ROMERO, husband; ORDER PEGGY SCHWALLIER, wife; JOHN DOE SCHWALLIER, husband, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed January 31, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

1723 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redding v. Safford Unified School District 1, (9th Cir. 2008).

Redding v. Safford Unified School District 1 (Redding v. Safford Unified School District 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.