Reddick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Reddick v. State

102 S.E. 132, 24 Ga. App. 776, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 518

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 24, 1920

Docket10404

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 132 (Reddick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reddick v. State, 102 S.E. 132, 24 Ga. App. 776, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 518 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworm, J.

1. In answer to questions in this ease, certified to the Supreme Court by this court, that court said: “After the selection of a jury in the trial of a criminal case, in which the accused has participated (assuming from the question under review that the defendant in the instant case did participate in the selection of a jury), and after the introduction of evidence upon the merits of the case has commenced, the defendant will be deemed to have waived formal arraignment, and it is then too late for him to demur; and the court did not err in refusing to allow the defendant to demur, nor in overruling the motion to quash.” (For the statement of facts upon which the above ruling was made, see Reddick v. State, 149 Ga. 822, 102 S.E. 347).

2. There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial; the evidence supports the verdict, which is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworm, J.

1. In answer to questions in this ease, certified to the Supreme Court by this court, that court said: “After the selection of a jury in the trial of a criminal case, in which the accused has participated (assuming from the question under review that the defendant in the instant case did participate in the selection of a jury), and after the introduction of evidence upon the merits of the case has commenced, the defendant will be deemed to have waived formal arraignment, and it is then too late for him to demur; and the court did not err in refusing to allow the defendant to demur, nor in overruling the motion to quash.” (For the statement of facts upon which the above ruling was made, see Reddick v. State, 149 Ga. 822, 102 S.E. 347).

2. There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for new trial; the evidence supports the verdict, which is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 132, 24 Ga. App. 776, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddick-v-state-gactapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack