Reddick v. State
102 S.E. 347, 149 Ga. 822, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 416
Opinions
After the selection of a jury in the trial of a criminal case, in which the accused has participated (assuming from the question under review that the defendant in the instant case did partieipate in the selection of a jury), and after the introduction of evidence upon the merits of the ease has commenced, the defendant will be deemed to have waived formal arraignment, and' it' is then too late for him to demur; and the court did not err in refusing to allow the defendant to demur, nor in overruling the motion to quash.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reddick v. State, 102 S.E. 347, 149 Ga. 822, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 416 (Ga. 1920).
102 S.E. 347 (Reddick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bramblett v. State
236 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Bramblett v. State
229 S.E.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Davis v. State
217 S.E.2d 343 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Sellers v. State
62 S.E.2d 395 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
McClendon v. State
58 S.E.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Burns v. State
11 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Gravitt v. State
185 S.E. 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Peavey v. State
111 S.E. 420 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Caswell v. State
107 S.E. 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Reddick v. State
102 S.E. 132 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)