Reddick v. State

974 So. 2d 1118, 2008 WL 157154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reddick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 937 So. 2d 1279
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 18, 2008·No. 1D07-3924·Published

Opinion

974 So.2d 1118 (2008)

Shontel REDDICK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D07-3924.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 18, 2008.
Rehearing Denied February 22, 2008.

Shontel Reddick, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Terry P. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The Appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of *1119 Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the trial court's order was issued during the pendency of the Appellant's direct appeal, we quash the order of denial. See Holiday v. State, 845 So.2d 252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765 (Fla.1998); Burch v. State, 721 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ORDER QUASHED.

ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reddick v. State, 974 So. 2d 1118, 2008 WL 157154 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

974 So. 2d 1118 (Reddick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burch v. State
721 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Holiday v. State
845 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Daniels v. State
712 So. 2d 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)