Reddick v. State
This text of 974 So. 2d 1118 (Reddick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shontel REDDICK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Shontel Reddick, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Terry P. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The Appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of *1119 Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the trial court's order was issued during the pendency of the Appellant's direct appeal, we quash the order of denial. See Holiday v. State, 845 So.2d 252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765 (Fla.1998); Burch v. State, 721 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
ORDER QUASHED.
ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 So. 2d 1118, 2008 WL 157154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddick-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.