Reddick v. State
629 So. 2d 1117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 180, 1994 WL 12547
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reddick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4093 →
Opinion
We vacate the sentences imposing incarceration after violation of probation in case numbers 89-3979 and 89-4289 and remand for resentencing in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the supreme court in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). We reject the state’s argument that Tripp only applies to separate counts and not to separate eases. That issue was determined adversely to the state in Bryant v. State, 622 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
SENTENCES VACATED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reddick v. State, 629 So. 2d 1117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 180, 1994 WL 12547 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
629 So. 2d 1117 (Reddick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Bryant v. State
622 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)