Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reddick v. State

Reddick v. State

629 So. 2d 1117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 180, 1994 WL 12547
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 1994
DocketNo. 93-892
StatusPublished

This text of 629 So. 2d 1117 (Reddick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reddick v. State, 629 So. 2d 1117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 180, 1994 WL 12547 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the sentences imposing incarceration after violation of probation in case numbers 89-3979 and 89-4289 and remand for resentencing in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the supreme court in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). We reject the state’s argument that Tripp only applies to separate counts and not to separate eases. That issue was determined adversely to the state in Bryant v. State, 622 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

SENTENCES VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Bryant v. State
622 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 So. 2d 1117, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 180, 1994 WL 12547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reddick-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.