Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's Dairy

Eleventh Circuit

Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's Dairy

169 F.3d 1378, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 451, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4662, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1408, 1999 WL 149597

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 1999

Docket97-5121

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 F.3d 1378 (Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's Dairy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's Dairy, 169 F.3d 1378, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 451, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4662, 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1408, 1999 WL 149597 (11th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI