Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland
138 S. Ct. 557, 199 L. Ed. 2d 437
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 11, 2017·No. No. 17–431.·Published·Cited by 28 cases
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland, 138 S. Ct. 557, 199 L. Ed. 2d 437 (U.S. 2017).
138 S. Ct. 557 (Recycle for Change v. City of Oakland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HSBC Bank, USA v. Hum
S.D. New York, 2024
Office Create Corporation v. Planet Entertainment, LLC
S.D. New York, 2023
MOFFITT v. BRITTON
W.D. Pennsylvania, 2023
Kondot S.A. v. Duron LLC
S.D. New York, 2022
Bostock v. Clayton County
590 U.S. 644 (Supreme Court, 2020)
Spencer v. Derrick
S.D. Alabama, 2020
Campbell v. We Transport, Inc.
E.D. New York, 2020
Bennett v. Pipe Work Solutions LLC
N.D. Alabama, 2020
Halberg v. United Behavioral Health
E.D. New York, 2019
FOY V. WILSON, SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE
M.D. Georgia, 2019
Ken Bailey and Bradley Peterson v. Carter Smith, Executive Director Clayton Wolf, Wildlife Division Director Mitch Lockwood, Big Game Program Director And Texas Parks &Wildlife Department
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
Roy W. Bruce v. U.S. Bank National Association
Eleventh Circuit, 2019
Chaney v. Community Hospice of Baldwin County
S.D. Alabama, 2019
William James v. Barbara Hunt
Eleventh Circuit, 2018
John M. Barone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Eleventh Circuit, 2018
Primo C. Novero v. Duke Energy
Eleventh Circuit, 2018
Natasha L. Smitherman v. Decatur Plastics Products Inc.
Eleventh Circuit, 2018
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
894 F.3d 1335 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Club One Casino, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior
328 F. Supp. 3d 1033 (E.D. California, 2018)