Recinos v. State of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided September 6, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-05592·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT TACOMA 7 TIFFANY RECINOS, CASE NO. C23-5592 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., 11 Defendant. 12

13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Grady J. Leupold’s 14 Report and Recommendation (R&R), Dkt. 3, recommending that the Court deny pro se 15 plaintiff Tiffany Recinos’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and 16 dismiss her complaint without prejudice, and without leave to amend. Recinos has not 17 objected to the R&R. 18 A district judge must determine de novo any part of a magistrate judge’s proposed 19 disposition to which a party has properly objected. The district judge may accept, reject, 20 or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to 21 the magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A proper objection 22 1 requires specific written objections to the findings and recommendations in the R&R. 2 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

3 Judge Leupold’s R&R details the issues with Recinos’s proposed complaint, 4 including her failure to state a plausible claim against any defendant. This Court also 5 notes that the case is substantially similar to a case recently dismissed by this Court, 6 Recinos v. Nationwide Insurance Company, Cause No. 22-5097 BHS. 7 As the Court informed Recinos in that case, it will address in a separate order 8 whether Recinos should be barred under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) from further vexatious,

9 harassing, and duplicative filings in this District, absent a pre-filing showing of imminent 10 danger to herself or her property. Recinos will have an opportunity to address that issue 11 before any such order is entered. 12 The R&R is ADOPTED, Recinos’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is 13 DENIED, and the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to

14 amend. 15 The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case. 17 Dated this 6th day of September, 2023. A 18 19 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 20 United States District Judge

21 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Recinos v. State of Washington, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Recinos v. State of Washington (Recinos v. State of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related