Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.

2019 TN WC 161
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims·Decided November 12, 2019·No. 2018-06-2210·Published

Opinion

FILED Nov 12, 2019 07:15 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2210 Employee, ) < ) Imperial Guard & Detective Service, ) State File No. 80107-2018 Inc., ) Employer, ) And ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED RELIEF

The Court held an expedited hearing on November 7, 2019. Maikel Reazkallah seeks treatment for his legs and temporary partial disability benefits from his former employer, Imperial Guard & Detective Service. The Court finds he failed to satisfy his burden of proof on both issues and denies the requested relief at this time.

History of Claim

This is Mr. Reazkallah’s second expedited hearing in this case.' On April 21, 2018, Mr. Reazkallah was assaulted while working for Imperial as a security guard. Imperial provided authorized treatment with Dr. Michael Ladouceur.

The parties dispute the extent of his injuries from the assault. Mr. Reazkallah testified that the assailant hurt both legs and that a video of the incident shows this, but he did not introduce the video into evidence. He also stated that he reported pain in both legs at his last visit with Dr. Ladouceur, but the doctor said he was authorized only to treat his left knee.

' The Court previously ordered Imperial to pay a medical bill from Doverside Emergency Physicians, LLC. The bill remains unpaid. Mr. Reazkallah must inform the provider to bill the carrier, Zurich American Insurance Company.

At the previous expedited hearing, Mr. Reazkallah testified that he injured his right hand and left knee during the altercation. He made no mention of an injury to his right leg. At a later discovery deposition, Mr. Reazkallah testified that he was hit in the face and head, and that the assailant bit his hand. He also stated the assailant “start[ed] hitting me in the leg,” but he did not specify which leg. He said the emergency providers treated his hand, head and “leg.” The Court carefully reviewed the deposition for any references to a right-leg injury and found none.

According to the medical records, he reported that he “struck his left knee” to emergency providers, who noted “[mlild pain with range of motion of the left knee where there is an abrasion . . . otherwise his extremities have no tenderness or deformity or other sign of trauma.” They x-rayed the left knee only and diagnosed a left-knee sprain. Dr. Jacob Radford completed an April 21, 2018 Return to Work Form with restrictions to the “left leg.” Mr. Reazkallah did not introduce Dr. Ladouceur’s records other than forms placing restrictions.

Regarding his request for temporary partial disability benefits, Mr. Reazkallah introduced a Work Status Form from Advanced Ortho and Spine dated October 23, 2019, that recommends he stand for fifty minutes and sit for ten minutes every hour. Per the previous Expedited Hearing Order, Imperial terminated Mr. Reazkallah in May 2018, and Mr. Reazkallah agreed that events leading to his dismissal were unrelated to his workers’ compensation claim.

Mr. Reazkallah now works for Allied Universal Security and Rock Solid. He testified that his pay rate changes depending on where Allied assigns him, but he offered no documentary proof of his wages. Mr. Reazkallah stated that before receiving restrictions, he worked eighty hours per week but now works approximately forty hours weekly. He also said that physical therapy limited his assignments and resulted in him earning less money.

Imperial argued that the only evidence that Mr. Reazkallah injured his right leg in the assault is his recent testimony. It further contended that his termination was for cause, and that, but for the termination, it would have accommodated Mr. Reazkallah’s restrictions. Imperial raised the termination defense in closing argument and offered no testimony on this issue.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law At an expedited hearing, Mr. Reazkallah must present sufficient evidence to prove he would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019).

To receive medical benefits, Mr. Reazkallah must show that he suffered a right-leg injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). As the Supreme Court stated, “[t]he nature and extent of the employee’s injuries, and the issue of medical causation, usually come to light in the course of treatment of the employee’s injuries.” Quaker Oats Co. v. Smith, 574 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Tenn. 1978).

Here, Mr. Reazkallah suffered an injury on April 21, 2018, and sought treatment that same day. He did not report an injury to his right leg. Dr. Radford examined Mr. Reazkallah and diagnosed mild pain with range of motion in his left knee but noted “no tenderness or deformity or other sign of trauma” in any of his other extremities. Mr. Reazkallah also did not testify to right-leg pain at the previous expedited hearing.

At the present hearing, he testified that the right leg needs treatment but did not introduce any medical records documenting complaints of pain or other symptoms. Mr. Reazkallah claimed that a video of the assault would show he injured both legs, but he did not introduce it.

In sum, the only proof the Court has that he injured his right leg is Mr. Reazkallah’s testimony. The Court finds his testimony insufficient to succeed at a hearing on the merits in proving a right-leg injury in light of the dearth of evidence supporting this assertion in the medical records and lack of testimony alleging this injury at the previous expedited hearing. His request for treatment of the right leg is denied.

Mr. Reazkallah also requested temporary partial disability benefits. Temporary partial disability refers to the time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume some gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Hackney v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *11 (July 22, 2016). In all cases of temporary partial disability, the compensation shall be sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the difference between the average weekly wage of the worker at the time of the injury and the wage the worker is able to earn in the worker’s partially disabled condition. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A).

Mr. Reazkallah’s only evidence on this issue was his testimony about his reduced earnings. He testified about varying hourly rates depending on his assignments, that he has missed work at times due to physical therapy, and that his recent restrictions keep him from working as much as before. But he did not provide specifics about how much he earned before or after the injury. He also introduced no wage stubs or other documentary proof demonstrating a wage reduction. Further, he agreed at the previous expedited hearing that his work injury was unrelated to Imperial’s decision to terminate him. For these reasons, the Court holds Mr. Reazkallah would not likely prevail at a hearing on the merits on this issue and denies this request at this time.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Mr. Reazkallah’s requested relief is denied.

2. This case is set for a status hearing on January 28, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. Central. You must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025 to participate in the Hearing. Failure to call might result in a determination of issues without your participation.

ENTERED November 12, 2019.

JUDGE KENNETH M: Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits: 1. Affidavit, March 25, 2019 First Report of Injury Medical records Affidavit, September 12, 2019 Work Status Form Mr. Reazkallah’s deposition transcript Work Status Form, September 4, 2019 Work Status Form, October 23, 2019

SAA se eB

Technical Record:

Petition for Benefit Determination

Dispute Certification Notice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc., 2019 TN WC 161 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

2019 TN WC 161 (Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quaker Oats Co. v. Smith
574 S.W.2d 45 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)