Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.

2019 TN WC 103
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 10, 2019
Docket2018-06-2210
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 103 (Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc., 2019 TN WC 103 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Jul 10, 2019

01:13 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2210 Employee, ) v. ) Imperial Guard & Detective Service, ) State File No. 80107-2018 Inc., ) Employer, ) And ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held a hearing on Maikel Reazkallah’s request for medical and temporary disability benefits on July 9, 2019. By agreement of the parties, the Court orders that Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc. pay a medical bill for emergency care and offer Mr. Reazkallah a panel of physicians. However, Mr. Reazkallah is not entitled to temporary disability benefits at this time.

History of Claim

On April 21, 2018, Mr. Reazkallah was assaulted while working for Imperial as a security guard. He injured his right hand and left knee during the altercation. Afterward, Mr. Reazkallah sought emergency treatment, where providers recommended he undergo follow-up treatment “with US HealthWorks or another doctor selected by his workers’ comp plan.” Mr. Reazkallah did not seek additional treatment. He testified that he asked his supervisor to return to a doctor, but the request was denied. Mr. Reazkallah stated his knee still hurts and makes it difficult for him to stand for long periods of time.

Imperial accepted Mr. Reazkallah’s claim and paid for some of Mr. Reazkallah’s emergency care. Mr. Reazkallah requested payment of a bill from Doverside Emergency

Physicians, LLC. Imperial agreed to pay the outstanding bill and to provide a panel of physicians for additional treatment.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION Regarding his request for lost wages, Mr. Reazkallah testified that after the accident, Imperial changed his job duties and assignments and later cut his hours, all in an attempt to make him quit. Mr. Reazkallah also stated that a manager, “Sammy,” harassed him because of his religion. On cross-examination, Mr. Reazkallah acknowledged that the post-accident changes in his work conditions were not due to his

workers’ compensation claim but rather religious differences. Imperial terminated him in May 2018.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an expedited hearing, Mr. Reazkallah must present sufficient evidence to prove

he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018).

Mr. Reazkallah requested temporary partial disability benefits. He is eligible for these benefits if he earned less than his average weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A). Mr. Reazkallah agreed that the changes in his work conditions were not due to his injury or work restrictions but rather the tension between him and his manager due to their different religious beliefs. Therefore, the

Court holds Mr. Reazkallah is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits and denies his request.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Imperial shall offer a panel of orthopedists from which Mr. Reazkallah shall select a physician to treat his knee.

2. Imperial shall pay the Doverside Emergency Physicians bill.

3. The Court denies Mr. Reazkallah’s request for temporary disability benefits at this time.

4. This case is set for a status hearing on August 26, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. Central. You must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025 to participate in the

Hearing. Failure to call might result in a determination of issues without your participation.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to

2 WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit via email at WCCompliance.Program@tn. gov.

ENTERED July 10, 2019.

DGE KENNETH M. SWI

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Affidavit

2. First Report of Injury

3. Medical records

4. Doverside Emergency Physicians bill

5. Carrier’s proof of payment of medical bills

6. Mr. Reazkallah’s deposition transcript

Technical Record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Dispute Certification Notice 3. Request for Expedited Hearing 4. Employer’s Position Statement

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on July

10, 2019. Name Certified | Email | Service sent to: Mail Maikel Reazkallah, X X 5161 Rice Road, Apt. 261, Employee Antioch TN 37013 Maikel.reazkallah@yahoo.com David Weatherman, x David. Weatherman(@zurichna.com; Employer’s Attorney Christi.thomas(@zurichna.com

Penny Shriya), Clerk of Court Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(2)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reazkallah-maikel-v-imperial-guard-detective-service-inc-tennworkcompcl-2019.