Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.
This text of 400 A.2d 490 (Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MARGARET REARDON AND DANIEL REARDON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MARLAYNE, INC. T/A BEAR BRAKE PALISADES AND GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges MATTHEWS and MILMED.
Mr. John E. Patton and Mr. Paul J. Jackson argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Gaccione, Pomaco, Patton & Beck, attorneys; Mr. Jackson and Mr. Patton on the brief).
Mr. Thomas L. Morrissey argued the cause for respondent General Motors Corporation (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Mr. Morrissey and Mr. Robert E. Turtz on the brief).
No brief was filed on behalf of respondent Marlayne, Inc. t/a Bear Brake Palisades.
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Bilder in his opinion of October 31, 1978 reported at 163 N.J. Super. 529 (Law Div. 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
400 A.2d 490, 167 N.J. Super. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reardon-v-marlayne-inc-njsuperctappdiv-1979.