Reagan v. Hartel

312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 2010 WL 2284180
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2010·No. ED 93636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Reagan appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits. We find *476 that the Commission did not err in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reagan v. Hartel, 312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 2010 WL 2284180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

312 S.W.3d 475 (Reagan v. Hartel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nieder v. SIFRIT
312 S.W.3d 475 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)