Reagan v. Hartel

312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 2010 WL 2284180
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 8, 2010
DocketED 93636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 312 S.W.3d 475 (Reagan v. Hartel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reagan v. Hartel, 312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 2010 WL 2284180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Reagan appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits. We find *476 that the Commission did not err in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nieder v. SIFRIT
312 S.W.3d 475 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 2010 WL 2284180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reagan-v-hartel-moctapp-2010.