Nieder v. SIFRIT
312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2010 WL 2284178
Opinion
ORDER
Scott Nieder and Tiffany Welker (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s judgment denying their request for attorney’s fees. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s fees.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nieder v. SIFRIT, 312 S.W.3d 475, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2010 WL 2284178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
312 S.W.3d 475 (Nieder v. SIFRIT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C.T. v. J.L.L.
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2022
Reagan v. Hartel
312 S.W.3d 475 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)