Rea v. Montgomery Home Telephone Co.

127 P. 603, 88 Kan. 82, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided November 9, 1912·No. No. 17,745·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In the motion for rehearing in this case a remark made in the opinion is construed as a criticism of the abstract—that it was not sufficient to present the question contended for. This is a mistake.. The abstract is unobjectionable; it narrates the evidence and does not copy it from the record.

The contention was that the issue was res judicata,, having been previously decided in the United States, circuit court of Kansas. As said in .the opinion, the: evidence failed to show the four conditions necessary to make the matter res judicata, to wit: identity in. the things sued for, identity of the cause of action,, identity of the persons and parties to the action, and identity in the quality of the persons for or against whom the claim is made.

The motion for a rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rea v. Montgomery Home Telephone Co., 127 P. 603, 88 Kan. 82, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 18 (kan 1912).

127 P. 603 (Rea v. Montgomery Home Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adamson v. Hill
449 P.2d 536 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)
Hofstetter v. Geo. M. Myers Construction, Inc.
227 P.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1951)
Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
91 P.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1939)