Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman

505 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1843

StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 529 (Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman, 505 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment entered below based on an adverse jury verdict in a breach of contract action. We see no merit in any of the points raised on appeal, save one. The final judgment under review should be modified, we conclude, so as to substitute the personal representative of the estate of Robert Kaufman for the estate of Robert Kaufman as the prevailing party below. See Ellis v. Strickland, 158 Fla. 736, 30 So.2d 100 (1947); §§ 733.607, 733.612(20), Fla.Stat. (1985); 18 Fla.Jur.2d Decedents’ Property §§ 696-99 (1980); cf. Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So.2d 855, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, dismissed, 317 So.2d 76 (Fla.1975). This modification may be accomplished by the trial court upon the rendition of our mandate in this cause. As thus modified, the final judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment entered below based on an adverse jury verdict in a breach of contract action. We see no merit in any of the points raised on appeal, save one. The final judgment under review should be modified, we conclude, so as to substitute the personal representative of the estate of Robert Kaufman for the estate of Robert Kaufman as the prevailing party below. See Ellis v. Strickland, 158 Fla. 736, 30 So.2d 100 (1947); §§ 733.607, 733.612(20), Fla.Stat. (1985); 18 Fla.Jur.2d Decedents’ Property §§ 696-99 (1980); cf. Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So.2d 855, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, dismissed, 317 So.2d 76 (Fla.1975). This modification may be accomplished by the trial court upon the rendition of our mandate in this cause. As thus modified, the final judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-v-estate-of-kaufman-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack