Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman

505 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1987·No. No. 86-1843·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment entered below based on an adverse jury verdict in a breach of contract action. We see no merit in any of the points raised on appeal, save one. The final judgment under review should be modified, we conclude, so as to substitute the personal representative of the estate of Robert Kaufman for the estate of Robert Kaufman as the prevailing party below. See Ellis v. Strickland, 158 Fla. 736, 30 So.2d 100 (1947); §§ 733.607, 733.612(20), Fla.Stat. (1985); 18 Fla.Jur.2d Decedents’ Property §§ 696-99 (1980); cf. Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So.2d 855, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, dismissed, 317 So.2d 76 (Fla.1975). This modification may be accomplished by the trial court upon the rendition of our mandate in this cause. As thus modified, the final judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman, 505 So. 2d 529, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 529 (Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adler v. Adler
418 So. 2d 1007 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Becker v. King
307 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Ellis v. Strickland
30 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)