Ellis v. Strickland
30 So. 2d 100, 158 Fla. 736, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 623
Opinion
Whereas it appears that in the final decree the name of “John Stallings” is used where the name “John Strickland” should have been used, it is directed that the final decree be modified by inserting the name “John Strickland” where the name “John Stallings” was inadvertently used.
The decree when so modified is affirmed on authority of our opinion and judgment in Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817, 172 So. 89.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ellis v. Strickland, 30 So. 2d 100, 158 Fla. 736, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 623 (Fla. 1947).
30 So. 2d 100 (Ellis v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raymond v. Estate of Kaufman
505 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Jensen v. Bledsoe
593 P.2d 988 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)