Raymond R. Bill & Co. v. Commissioner

15 B.T.A. 320, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2880
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedFebruary 11, 1929
DocketDocket No. 15399.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 B.T.A. 320 (Raymond R. Bill & Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond R. Bill & Co. v. Commissioner, 15 B.T.A. 320, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2880 (bta 1929).

Opinion

[321]*321OPINION.

Van Fossan:

The evidence in this case convinces us that at the time petitioner accepted the stock of its debtor in part payment of its debt, the stock was worthless. It took the stock only because by [322]*322agreeing so to do it couicl obtain payment of one-half of the debt in cash. It was a case of take part cash and part stock or force the debtor into bankruptcy, in which event petitioner believed “we would have received practically nothing; as it was, we received 50 per cent of our account.” Petitioner, therefore, suffered a deductible loss at the time it received the stock.

The principle of the issue as to the statute of limitations and the validity of the waiver of November 21, 1925, was decided adversely to petitioner’s contention in Worumbo Mfg. Co., 13 B. T. A. 883.

Judgment loill be entered under Bule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wedum Supply Co. v. Commissioner
1990 T.C. Memo. 468 (U.S. Tax Court, 1990)
Raymond R. Bill & Co. v. Commissioner
15 B.T.A. 320 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 B.T.A. 320, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-r-bill-co-v-commissioner-bta-1929.