Raymond International, Inc., a Corporation v. Bookcliff Construction, Inc., a Corporation v. Metropolitan Utilities District, Third Party

489 F.2d 732, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10262
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 1, 1974·No. 73-1485·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond International, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, filed this lawsuit against Bookcliff Construction, Inc., a Colorado corporation, seeking to recover the amount due under a construction contract involving a well field water collection system for Metropolitan Utilities District’s (MUD) Platte River Water Treatment Plant. Bookcliff filed a third party complaint against MUD and prayed that judgment be rendered in its favor in any amount adjudged to be due from Bookcliff to plaintiff; and also for damages resulting from flooding of the project which was the subject of the construction contract. The controversy between Raymond International and Bookcliff was settled. The third party claim was tried before the court, which found the issues in favor of MUD and from the ensuing judgment Bookcliff has appealed.

We have considered appellant’s contentions and find them lacking sufficient substance to warrant interference with the district court’s soundly reasoned opinion, which is reported at 347 F. Supp. 208 (D.Neb.1972).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond International, Inc., a Corporation v. Bookcliff Construction, Inc., a Corporation v. Metropolitan Utilities District, Third Party, 489 F.2d 732, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10262 (3d Cir. 1974).

489 F.2d 732 (Raymond International, Inc., a Corporation v. Bookcliff Construction, Inc., a Corporation v. Metropolitan Utilities District, Third Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCann v. Frank B. Hall & Co.
109 F.R.D. 363 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)