Rayburn v. State
This text of 356 S.W.2d 774 (Rayburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the decision of the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals in City of Amarillo v. Adams, Texas Civ. App., 342 S.W. 2d 371 (wr. dis.), the Texarkana Court of Civil Appeals has held that the period for filing objections to the award of the commissioners in a condemnation proceeding as provided in Article 3266, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. Civ. Stat., is not enlarged by the provisions of Rule 4, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. State v. Rayburn, Texas Civ. App., 352 S.W. 2d 357. We are in agreement with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals in the present case, because the Rules of Civil Procedure do not operate to extend the time provided by statute within which an appeal may be taken to the courts in a proceeding originally administrative in nature. The application for writ of error is Refused, No Reversible Error.
Opinion delivered April 25, 1962.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 S.W.2d 774, 163 Tex. 450, 5 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 337, 1962 Tex. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayburn-v-state-tex-1962.