Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Ray v. State

Ray v. State

5 S.W.2d 513, 109 Tex. Crim. 484, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Tex. Crim. 575 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 1928·No. No. 11736.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Forgery is the offense, penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record fails to disclose either the sentence or notice of appeal. The absence of these is made the basis of a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 5 S.W.2d 513, 109 Tex. Crim. 484, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318 (Tex. 1928).

5 S.W.2d 513 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.