Ray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ray v. State

5 S.W.2d 513, 109 Tex. Crim. 484, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 18, 1928

DocketNo. 11736.

StatusPublished

This text of 5 S.W.2d 513 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. State, 5 S.W.2d 513, 109 Tex. Crim. 484, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318 (Tex. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Forgery is the offense, penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record fails to disclose either the sentence or notice of appeal. The absence of these is made the basis of a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Forgery is the offense, penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record fails to disclose either the sentence or notice of appeal. The absence of these is made the basis of a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed. Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 S.W.2d 513, 109 Tex. Crim. 484, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-texcrimapp-1928.