Ray v. State

941 So. 2d 569, 2006 WL 3299915
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2006·No. 4D05-3841·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

941 So.2d 569 (2006)

David RAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-3841.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 15, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and John M. Conway, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm appellant's conviction on the charge of robbery with a weapon. Appellant raises as his final issue on appeal that *570 the trial court erred in sentencing him as a prison releasee reoffender based on inadmissible hearsay evidence. We affirm as to this issue based on this court's recent en banc opinion in Yisrael v. State, 938 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and Corker v. State, 937 So.2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As in Yisrael and Corker, we also certify conflict with Gray v. State, 910 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. State, 941 So. 2d 569, 2006 WL 3299915 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 569 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ray v. State
7 So. 3d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Ray v. State
7 So. 3d 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)