Ray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ray v. State

10 So. 3d 1198, 2009 WL 1636906

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 987 So. 2d 155 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2009·No. 1D09-1430·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In light of appellant’s claim that his trial counsel neglected to comply with his request to pursue a timely appeal following resentencing, this *1199 disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek a belated appeal by filing a proper petition complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In light of appellant’s claim that his trial counsel neglected to comply with his request to pursue a timely appeal following resentencing, this *1199 disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek a belated appeal by filing a proper petition complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Ray v. State, 10 So. 3d 1198, 2009 WL 1636906 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

10 So. 3d 1198 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.