Ray v. Pennsylvania State Police

676 A.2d 194, 544 Pa. 260, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1121
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 14, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

CAPPY and NIGRO, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ray v. Pennsylvania State Police, 676 A.2d 194, 544 Pa. 260, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1121 (Pa. 1996).

676 A.2d 194 (Ray v. Pennsylvania State Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nolan v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
819 A.2d 159 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Holt v. Northwest Pennsylvania Training Partnership Consortium, Inc.
694 A.2d 1134 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)