Rawls v. Roberts

664 So. 2d 51, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12589, 1995 WL 713963
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 1995·No. No. 94-2000·Published

Opinion

STEVENSON, Judge.

Appellant, Tonica Rawls, challenges an order entered by the trial court granting appellee, Sun Bank, attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1993). We find that the record confirms the existence of a basis for such an award, however, the trial court’s order is technically deficient in that it contains no specific finding regarding the complete absence of a justiciable issue in appellant’s cause of action. Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to correct its technically deficient order. See Peerless Elec. Co., Inc. v. Goldberger, 473 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Fox v. Loejfler, 434 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rawls v. Roberts, 664 So. 2d 51, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12589, 1995 WL 713963 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 51 (Rawls v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Loeffler
434 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger
473 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)