Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger

473 So. 2d 300, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 7, 1985
DocketNo. 83-2234
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 473 So. 2d 300 (Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger, 473 So. 2d 300, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

We reverse and remand to permit the lower court to make a specific and explicit finding regarding a complete absence of a justiciable issue pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); see also Fox v. Loeffler, 434 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Our examination of the record confirms the existence of a basis for such a finding.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Cowie v. Orlowski
184 So. 3d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.
134 So. 3d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Rawls v. Roberts
664 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 So. 2d 300, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peerless-electric-co-v-goldberger-fladistctapp-1985.