Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger
473 So. 2d 300, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1985·No. No. 83-2234·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We reverse and remand to permit the lower court to make a specific and explicit finding regarding a complete absence of a justiciable issue pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); see also Fox v. Loeffler, 434 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Our examination of the record confirms the existence of a basis for such a finding.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger, 473 So. 2d 300, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
473 So. 2d 300 (Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Cowie v. Orlowski
184 So. 3d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.
134 So. 3d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Rawls v. Roberts
664 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)