Ravon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ravon v. State

159 So. 3d 945, 2015 WL 1064843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2015

DocketNo. 3D14-2078

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 So. 3d 945 (Ravon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ravon v. State, 159 So. 3d 945, 2015 WL 1064843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recueno and holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recueno and holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 3d 945, 2015 WL 1064843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ravon-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack