Ravon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ravon v. State

159 So. 3d 945, 2015 WL 1064843

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2015·No. No. 3D14-2078·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recueno and holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recueno and holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).

Ravon v. State, 159 So. 3d 945, 2015 WL 1064843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

159 So. 3d 945 (Ravon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related