Ratliff v. Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1027
JULIA ANN RATLIFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00005-GMW)
Submitted: July 11, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Nora R. Koch, Supervisory Regional Counsel, Elizabeth A. Corritore, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Julia A. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for summary judgment and granting the
Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for
supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Ratliff v. Astrue, No.
2:06-cv-00005-GMW (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ratliff v. Astrue (Ratliff v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.