Ratliff v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2007·No. 07-1027·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1027

JULIA ANN RATLIFF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00005-GMW)

Submitted: July 11, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Nora R. Koch, Supervisory Regional Counsel, Elizabeth A. Corritore, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Julia A. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for summary judgment and granting the

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for

supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Ratliff v. Astrue, No.

2:06-cv-00005-GMW (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratliff v. Astrue, (4th Cir. 2007).

Ratliff v. Astrue (Ratliff v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.